Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Lars's avatar

The end of the first paragraph: “I admit that” and then what…? Sentence seems to be missing :)

Tim Pilbrow's avatar

In my experience, people can be so traumatised by Theory X impositions on them that they are unable to trust a Theory Y approach. That is, an enlightened manager in the middle cannot build that trust alone. Nor can an enlightened leader alone. Bringing in a change framework from above is a Theory X approach dressed up as Theory Y. You have to make everyone a partner in figuring out the better way. If it comes in as an idea or model from the middle or top, it will meet resistance. If you pose a challenge and give people latitude to figure out a way through, there’s no imposition. What strikes me about the Semco case in particular is the radical trust that was at the centre of the shift in workplace culture. It was an existential crisis and workers were given full latitude to solve problems. With no guarantees and no safety net.

The Semco model is not the culture/structure that emerged (which is not repeatable) but the radical trust and partnership in challenge. Acting from a Theory Y perspective, not pushing Theory Y as an idea.

1 more comment...

No posts

Ready for more?